Weird Sh*t I ate: Cabbage Chickpea Tilapia Bowl

 

Obesity: Disease, Symptom, or Systemic Signal?...

Obesity is often framed in the U.S. as a matter of individual choice. Eat less, move more, and the problem goes away—or so the story goes. But if that were true, why would so many Americans continue to gain weight, and why do newcomers to the U.S. so often find themselves gaining weight after arrival? These questions cut to the heart of the issue: obesity is not simply the product of poor choices. It is the outward sign of a deeper systemic disruption.

Disease or Symptom?

Medical institutions like the American Medical Association classify obesity as a disease. It has identifiable biological mechanisms: excess fat tissue drives inflammation, disrupts hormones, and increases insulin resistance. From this perspective, treating obesity directly makes sense—just as you would treat high blood pressure or diabetes.

But from a broader perspective, obesity behaves more like a symptom. It is the fever of the modern world, an outward signal of systemic breakdown in food systems, stress environments, and social structures. The same forces that produce obesity—poverty, chronic stress, ultra-processed diets, lack of walkability, sleep disruption—also directly cause poor health outcomes. In that light, obesity is less the origin of disease and more the red flag that the system itself is diseased.

And here’s where the nuance matters: it’s possible, if not probable, that hormonal disruption comes first. Environmental stressors, disrupted sleep, endocrine-disrupting chemicals, and hyper-processed diets can all alter appetite hormones, insulin sensitivity, and fat storage before significant weight gain ever occurs. Once excess fat accumulates—especially around the liver and visceral organs—it then exacerbates the hormonal imbalance. This explains why many people don’t just gain ten pounds and stay there; instead, weight gain often becomes progressive, with the body defending a higher and higher set point.

The Poverty Trope

You’ve likely heard the claim that “poor people are fatter.” It’s a half-truth wrapped in simplification. Yes, lower-income groups in the U.S. tend to show higher obesity rates, but the picture is uneven. The association is stronger for women than men, and it varies across racial and cultural groups. Middle- and higher-income groups are far from immune.

More importantly, “poverty” is defined by narrow thresholds, while vulnerability to poor food environments stretches far beyond the poverty line. Many families not considered poor by federal measures still live paycheck to paycheck, still lack access to fresh food, and still spend most of their lives in sedentary or stressful environments. So the trope isn’t wrong so much as misleading. It ignores the complexity of systemic exposure.

The American Environment

Why America? Why now?

1. Food Engineering: Our food supply is dominated by ultra-processed, calorie-dense, nutrient-light products engineered to override satiety and condition the brain’s reward systems.

2. Portion Inflation: Serving sizes have ballooned over the past 50 years, normalizing excess intake.

3. Lifestyle Shift: Sedentary work, long commutes, and car dependence drain energy expenditure from daily life.

4. Stress & Sleep: High stress and short sleep elevate cortisol, altering appetite and fat storage.

5. Economic Incentives: Subsidies keep junk food cheap, while fresh produce remains relatively expensive and harder to access.

This is why immigrants—who often arrive leaner—tend to gain weight after several years in the U.S. They aren’t suddenly lazier or less disciplined. They are simply absorbing the environment.

Why Weight Persists

Even when people change their diets, the body resists weight loss. This is partly explained by set point theory: once weight is gained, the body defends it through stronger hunger signals and reduced energy burn. Add to that the microbiome changes from processed diets, exposure to environmental “obesogens,” and chronic circadian disruption, and you have a system where weight gain is easy but weight loss is biologically uphill.

Metabolic Health Beyond the Scale

Not all obesity is the same. Some individuals fall into what researchers call metabolically healthy obesity (MHO)—carrying extra weight but with normal blood sugar, cholesterol, and blood pressure. While MHO isn’t a guarantee of lifelong protection, it highlights a key truth: health isn’t synonymous with thinness. People can improve their metabolic health through diet quality, fitness, and reduced visceral fat even without reaching a “normal” BMI.

This matters because it shifts the goalpost. We should be aiming for healthier bodies and systems, not just smaller ones.

Bias in the Science

Here’s the uncomfortable part: much of the research and public conversation skips over the sequence question—what comes first, hormonal disruption or fat accumulation? Because of entrenched negative bias against obese individuals, obesity is often framed as the failure itself rather than the outcome of systemic dysfunction. That bias filters into study design, funding priorities, and clinical care. The result is that obesity is treated primarily as an individual disease of excess rather than as a systemic condition of disrupted physiology compounded by environment.

By centering bias, we risk misdiagnosis at the societal level. We punish the symptom while neglecting the disease.

The Bigger Picture

Obesity is both disease and symptom. It is a disease because excess fat tissue can amplify inflammation and hormonal dysfunction. It is a symptom because it signals that the environment we live in—our food systems, policies, and culture—drives bodies toward storing more fat than they once did.

The likely reality is that hormonal and metabolic disruption often comes first, with excess fat accelerating the process. That’s why weight gain is progressive, why people don’t simply “settle” at a slightly higher body weight, and why it’s so difficult to reverse once underway.

Final Thought

We cannot “willpower” our way out of this epidemic. To correct it, we must look upstream: reform food systems, reduce exposure to endocrine disruptors, redesign cities for movement, address economic insecurity, and rebuild healthier rhythms of sleep, stress, and daily life. Until then, obesity will continue to rise, not because individuals are failing, but because systems are.